The verdict: Choose Evertune for 140x more prompting volume, a clear roadmap of influential sources for your brand’s AI visibility, statistical significance and battle-tested leadership from The Trade Desk. Choose Profound if SOC 2 compliance is mandatory today and you need to integrate with Google Analytics via API.
Quick Take: Key Differences at a Glance
Bottom line: Evertune delivers 140x more prompts per brand at 18x lower cost per prompt, with unique API access to base models and battle-tested leadership from The Trade Desk that Profound cannot match.
The API Access Advantage: Why Base Model Measurement Matters
The most significant technical difference between Evertune and Profound isn't what they track—it's how they access AI models and what layer of knowledge they measure.
Evertune's Three-Layer Measurement Approach
Evertune is the only GEO platform with direct API access to foundation models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Meta, DeepSeek) combined with consumer application tracking (ChatGPT Search, Gemini Search, Perplexity, CoPilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews).
This dual-layer access reveals:
- Base Model Knowledge - What AI fundamentally knows about your brand before any search augmentation
- Search-Enhanced Responses - How real-time web retrieval affects recommendations
- The Delta Between Them - Whether search is helping or hurting your AI visibility
Why this matters for enterprise strategy:
AI agents and developer applications are built on base models (APIs), not consumer search apps. Brands optimizing only for ChatGPT Search or Perplexity miss the knowledge layer that will power:
- Agentic commerce platforms - AI shopping assistants that recommend products
- Enterprise AI assistants - Corporate tools built on foundation model APIs
- Developer-built applications - Custom AI experiences accessing base models
- Future AI-powered workflows - Agent-to-agent communication using API endpoints
Profound's Consumer-Only Approach
Profound tracks brand visibility on consumer applications through "front-end capture" that records what users see in AI interfaces.
What Profound cannot do:
- Isolate base model knowledge from search augmentation
- Measure what AI agents will recommend (they use APIs, not search apps)
- Identify whether poor visibility stems from training data gaps or real-time search issues
- Futureproof for agentic commerce built on foundation models
Why this limitation matters: When OpenAI launches agent-powered shopping or Google releases Gemini business assistants, these systems will rely on base model knowledge—not web search augmentation. Brands optimizing only for consumer search apps are building strategies on shifting sand.
Prompting Volume: The Foundation of Statistical Confidence
AI models are probabilistic systems. Ask ChatGPT the same question about luxury SUVs 10 times, and you'll get 10 slightly different answers with varying brand mentions, positioning, and sentiment.
This variability is the #1 reason most GEO platforms provide unreliable data.
Evertune's Volume-First Philosophy
1,250,000 monthly prompts per brand across all tracked platforms:
- 125 prompts tracked
- 100 times each
- Across 10+ AI engines
- = Statistical significance with confidence intervals
What this enables:
- Confidence intervals on every metric showing measurement precision
- Ability to detect real changes (5+ point shifts) vs random noise (2-3 point fluctuations)
- Reliable A/B testing of content strategies with statistical validation
- Trust in data when justifying six-figure content investments to CFOs
Source Influence: Topic and Brand Relevance
One of Evertune's most powerful competitive advantages is Topic Relevance and Brand Relevance, which measures the influence of each source URL on AI's perception of brands and categories sources into Opportunity URLs vs. Strength URLs.
What Evertune's Topic and Brand Relevance Reveals
Topic Relevance measures how strongly a source URL influences AI's understanding of your category. Brand Relevance measures the sentiment of your brand associated with the topic and category on the source.
Evertune provides three actionable URL classifications:
Strength URLs - Sources with high influence on your category that already associate your brand positively. These represent your content wins—double down here by maintaining relationships and publishing more content on these domains.
Opportunity URLs - Sources with high influence on your category where your brand isn't mentioned. These represent your biggest ROI targets for partnerships, guest posts, and content placement.
Owned URLs - Your brand-controlled properties and their influence on AI perception. See how your own content performs relative to third-party sources.
What Profound Lacks
Profound tracks which sources AI models cite and provides citation frequency data. However, Profound does not measure source influence or provide Topic/Brand Relevance scoring.
This means Profound users see which URLs get cited most frequently, but can not see:
- Which URLs actually shape AI's perception (influence ≠ frequency)
- Which high-influence sources don't mention your brand yet
- Prioritized opportunity lists for content partnerships
The difference matters: The most frequently cited source is often not the most influential source.
Battle-Tested Leadership from The Trade Desk
One of Evertune's most significant competitive advantages is the proven leadership team that built the platform.
The Trade Desk Pedigree
Evertune was founded by Brian Stempeck, Ed Chater, and Poul Costinsky—early team members from The Trade Desk, one of the most successful adtech companies in history. The Trade Desk went public in 2016 and has grown to a market cap exceeding $50 billion, becoming the leading independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital advertising.
What The Trade Desk experience means for Evertune:
Enterprise-scale infrastructure expertise. The Trade Desk processes over 13 million queries per second and analyzes 12 trillion digital ad opportunities annually. Evertune's founders bring this same infrastructure thinking to AI visibility measurement—which is why the platform handles 1.25M+ prompts per brand monthly while competitors struggle with scale limitations.
Data science at massive scale. The Trade Desk's success came from making data-driven advertising decisions across billions of data points with statistical rigor. Evertune applies this same methodology to AI visibility, understanding that small sample sizes produce unreliable insights.
Customer-first product development. The Trade Desk grew by solving real enterprise problems, not by building technology for technology's sake. Evertune's product roadmap reflects this philosophy - it focuses on enterprise customers’ need to close the insight-to-action gap and measure business impact.
Proven category creation experience. The Trade Desk didn't just build a DSP—they helped create and define the programmatic advertising category. Evertune's founders are now applying the same category-building expertise to Generative Engine Optimization, establishing measurement standards and best practices that will define the GEO category for years to come.
Profound's Leadership Background
Profound's founding team brings startup and technology experience, but lacks the battle-tested enterprise infrastructure and advertising technology pedigree that The Trade Desk veterans provide.
Why leadership matters in emerging categories: GEO platforms are barely 18 months old. The category will undergo massive evolution as AI search matures. Teams that have built enterprise-scale platforms through previous technology transitions have a significant advantage in navigating this uncertainty.
Cost Analysis: $2.40 vs $44.33 Per Thousand Prompts
Evertune is the most cost-effective enterprise GEO platform, at just $2.40 per thousand prompts tracked for your brand. Evertune's standard pricing includes 125 prompts tracked 100 times each across 10+ AI engines (ChatGPT, ChatGPT API, Claude, Gemini, Gemini API, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Meta, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and CoPilot) and 10 categories, totaling 1,250,000 monthly prompts per brand, translating to $2.40 per thousand prompts.
In comparison, Profound's standard pricing includes 100 prompts tracked 300 times total across just 3 engines, totaling 9,000 total monthly prompts per brand. This comes out to $44.33 per thousand prompts - 18x the price of Evertune. This limited sample size cannot account for AI response variability and can result in unreliable data that undermines optimization efforts.
What's Included in Evertune's Standard Pricing
Evertune's standard pricing includes comprehensive features that many platforms charge extra for:
10 Comprehensive Reports covering all aspects of AI visibility including brand mentions, sentiment, positioning, and competitive analysis across tracked platforms.
100 Sub-Topics enabling granular tracking of how your brand appears across different product categories, use cases, and buyer scenarios.
1.25+ Monthly Prompts customized by brand, providing statistically significant data that accounts for AI response variability and real-time search fluctuations.
Unlimited Logins allowing entire teams to access AI visibility data without per-seat pricing that inflates costs.
Dedicated Customer Support ensuring teams maximize platform value through expert guidance and strategic recommendations.
Unlimited Competitor Tracking monitoring how competitors perform across all tracked AI platforms without artificial limits or additional fees.
Competitive Intelligence: All Brands vs Limited Slots
A critical but often overlooked difference between platforms is how they handle competitive analysis.
Evertune's Comprehensive Approach
Evertune automatically tracks all brands that AI models mention within your category—not just brands you manually specify during setup.
Why this matters:
- Discover emerging competitors before they appear on your radar
- See which adjacent-category brands AI models consider competitive
- Track market share shifts as new entrants gain AI visibility
- Understand the complete competitive landscape AI presents to consumers
Profound's Limited Competitor Slots
Profound requires brands to specify which competitors to track, with limits based on plan tier. This approach:
- Creates blind spots for emerging threats
- Misses adjacent-category competition
- Requires manual updates as competitive landscape evolves
- Limits comprehensive market understanding
The Differentiation Matrix
Understanding when each platform makes sense:
Choose Evertune If You:
✅ Need statistical confidence in your data (100+ samples per prompt) ✅ Want to measure base model knowledge vs search-augmented responses ✅ Require unlimited competitor tracking across your entire category ✅ Value battle-tested leadership from The Trade Desk veterans ✅ Want the lowest cost-per-prompt in the category ($2.40 per 1K) ✅ Need Topic and Brand Relevance scoring to prioritize partnerships ✅ Are optimizing for agentic commerce and API-based AI experiences
Choose Profound If You:
✅ Are comfortable with smaller sample sizes and directional insights ✅ Don't need to isolate base model knowledge from search results ✅ Want SOC 2 Type II certification immediately (Evertune in progress) ✅ Are optimizing only for consumer search applications ✅ Need Google Analytics via API integration today
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What's the difference between how Evertune vs. Profound query AI models?
A: Both Evertune and Profound query consumer applications interfaces (i.e. chatgpt.com) via front-end capture. Evertune goes the extra mile to also query the foundation models (i.e. ChatGPT base model, Claude base model, Gemini base model) directly through developer APIs. The distinction matters because consumer apps blend base knowledge with real-time search, while APIs access pure model knowledge. Only API access enables isolating what AI fundamentally knows vs what search augmentation adds—critical for agent optimization.
Q: Is Profound's SOC 2 Type II certification a dealbreaker difference?
A: For highly-regulated industries (finance, healthcare, government), SOC 2 compliance may be mandatory for vendor selection. Evertune's compliance is in progress—ask your account team for timeline. For most enterprises, security questionnaires and vendor risk assessments suffice during compliance development. Evaluate whether your organization has hard compliance requirements or can work with vendors during their certification process.
Q: Does Evertune's lower pricing mean lower quality?
A: No—it reflects different unit economics and operational models. Evertune's automated, API-driven approach scales efficiently ($2.40 per 1K prompts). Profound's consultant-led model with dedicated strategists has higher service delivery costs ($44.33+ per 1K prompts). Lower price ≠ lower quality; it means Evertune chose operational efficiency and self-service velocity over premium consulting services.
Q: Why does the leadership background matter for a software platform?
A: GEO is an 18-month-old category that will undergo massive evolution. Teams that have built enterprise-scale platforms through previous technology transitions (like The Trade Desk founders navigating programmatic advertising) have proven advantages: infrastructure scaling expertise, data science rigor, customer-first product development, and category creation experience. First-time founders face steeper learning curves during market uncertainty.
Q: Can't I just try both platforms and decide?
A: In theory, yes. In practice, GEO platforms require 60-90 days minimum to demonstrate value (AI perception changes slowly). Most procurement cycles don't allow parallel 90-day evaluations. Instead:
- Choose Evertune if measurement scale, base model access, and cost efficiency matter most
- Choose Profound if SOC 2 compliance is mandatory today
- Re-evaluate in 12 months as both platforms evolve
The Bottom Line: Scale, Leadership, and Futureproofing
The GEO category is barely 18 months old. Both Evertune and Profound are pioneering solutions to an emerging problem—and both will continue evolving rapidly.
Today's differentiators:
Evertune wins on:
- ✅ Prompting volume (140x more samples per brand)
- ✅ Cost efficiency (18-23x lower cost per prompt)
- ✅ Base model API access (unique capability for agent optimization)
- ✅ Source influence measurement (Topic + Brand Relevance scoring)
- ✅ Battle-tested leadership from The Trade Desk
- ✅ Transparent pricing ($3,000/month public)
- ✅ Unlimited competitor tracking (all brands in category)
- ✅ Unlimited user logins (no per-seat fees)
- ✅ Agentic commerce readiness and futureproofing
Profound wins on:
- ✅ Enterprise compliance (SOC 2 Type II available now)
- ✅ Dedicated strategist
- ✅ Some advanced integrations and features
- ✅ Established enterprise customer base
For most enterprise marketing teams, the math favors Evertune: dramatically more data, significantly lower cost, faster execution through integrated content tools, battle-tested leadership from proven advertising technology veterans, and futureproofing for AI agents through base model access.
For organizations requiring immediate SOC 2 compliance, and premium positioning that justifies premium pricing, Profound's model may be the right fit.
Choose the platform that matches your organizational priorities—just make sure you're comparing the actual measurement scale, source influence capabilities, leadership experience, and unit economics, not just marketing claims.
Ready to see Evertune's platform in action? Book a demo at evertune.ai to explore how 1.25M+ monthly prompts, base model API access, Topic and Brand Relevance scoring, and leadership from The Trade Desk veterans can transform your AI visibility strategy.
This analysis reflects publicly available information and internal competitive analysis as of November 2025. Platform features and pricing evolve rapidly in the GEO category. Verify current capabilities with vendors before final selection. Evertune is the Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform that helps brands improve visibility in AI search.
Don't forget to share this post
